Europe: Migrant Crisis

We live in an increasingly globalist world, and with that comes multiculturalism. As a Canadian citizen, I have a first-row seat to multiculturalism. The different peoples and cultures of Earth are unique and diverse, each with their own distinct characteristics, some objectively good, and some objectively bad. Multiculturalism is also like a case-study for chemical reactions involving different ingredients.

Before I proceed, I should clarify something: I believe in judging people by the content of their character. I am not a racist, so anyone eagerly waiting with their finger on that trigger, as so many do – I won’t give you the smug satisfaction. If anything, I am an ethnic and cultural preservationist. I believe that the peoples of the Earth have every right to defend their cultural and ethnic identity. Furthermore, I believe they have a responsibility and obligation to. So this is not racist xenophobia, and I will never be a victim of white guilt.

What greatly concerns me today are the effects of immigration on Europe. The problem with the immigration happening in Europe right now, is how the foundations of my own heritage are being affected. I am of half Dutch ancestry, with the remaining half consisting of Austrian and northern Italian. These respective countries, along with the rest of Europe, are facing an immigration crisis today. Wave upon wave of Arab and African refugees and immigrants are descending upon Europe, by the millions.

So I ask you, the reader, to contemplate: How should native Europeans feel about this? If the recent trends in the media (or at least what the media permits exposure to) are any indication of how native Europeans truly feel, they are worried. And they should be.

For starters, if we were to compare the immigration statistics of native Europeans emigrating to the countries of the peoples who are immigrating to Europe, versus the other way around, what kind of disparity would we see?

In 2014, from January to July alone, around 100,000 undocumented migrants crossed the Mediterranean into Italy. This is considerably more than the record 60,000 who made the crossing in all of 2011. Keep in mind that for many of these migrants, Italy is not the final destination, but merely a way to access the rest of Europe. In 2014, Germany was the top country for asylum seekers, almost tripling that of Italy.

We do not see anywhere near these kinds of statistics to support a counter-balancing argument of Europeans immigrating to African and Arab countries. While there is a reality to this, that Europeans do in fact seek work opportunities and a better life in foreign lands (see European Diaspora), the statistics as they stand today, are by far disproportionately in favor of Europe being on the receiving end of this effect.

While there is inherently nothing wrong with seeking a better life, there is an issue when the measures taken by a people to achieve a better life directly undermine the foundations of the nation or people’s identity, integrity, culture, and way of life on the receiving end. There are serious implications as a result of current immigration patterns into Europe.

There are numerous publications and statistics that display the results of immigration on Europe. This article published in 2009 by British newspaper The Telegraph, gives a startling perspective. For example, one US Journalist asserted “Austria was 90 per cent Catholic in the 20th century but Islam could be the majority religion among Austrians aged under 15 by 2050”. Let us not forget the fact that the vast majority of Muslims do not consist of indigenous Austrians. The vast majority of Muslims in European countries consist of people of foreign descent, therefore a massive influx of Muslim population in Europe entails both an ethnic and cultural shift.

When you contrast the statistics of foreign immigration into Europe, with Europe’s relatively low birth rates, the picture becomes more clear. We may very well be seeing the advent of a land’s indigenous people being marginalized and replaced. There is only one other example in history I can think of that resembles this, and that is the British/European colonization of the American continent. The process and aftermath of this was not and is not positive. Natives in Canada are now afflicted by extreme rates of poverty and substance abuse. Their culture and way of life took a back seat while “Manifest Destiny” completely overrode the land. There were even genocides of native populations. I am uneasy about this daily reality, and can only imagine the suppressed and secretive hatred and resentment that native Americans (the real Americans) must harbor towards their occupying forces. I had no choice when I was born in Canada, but if the natives had a choice, would they have allowed the European colonization of their land?

The difference is Europe has a choice.

The parallels drawn between what happened in America and what is happening to Europe now, are not exactly proportionate, but still resonate with similiarities. I believe that Europe’s change is occurring at a relatively slow and gradual pace, but it is accelerating. Policy makers in Europe have been slow to address the problem. Some politicians take a more aggressive approach, such as Holland’s Geert Wilders, and let’s be realistic, his approach is closer to the kind that is needed. The reason I say that, is because passiveness, yielding to change, accepting the present moment, in a situation like Europe’s right now, is a recipe for disaster.

We can not afford to allow ethnic European’s land of origin to become saturated with people of foreign descent due to the fact that it would precipitate a gradual and eventual crisis of dilution. Dilution of European birth rates, culture, and ethnicity.

In September of 2000, newspaper The Guardian in this article, reported several startling revelations, under the headline “Non-Whites will be majority is US and Europe by 2050”. One demographer cited within, who refused to be named for fear of racist accusations (…I didn’t know it was possible to be a racist for sharing statistical facts) was quoted: ‘It’s a matter of pure arithmetic that, if nothing else happens, non-Europeans will become a majority and whites a minority in the UK. That would probably be the first time an indigenous population has voluntarily become a minority in its historic homeland.’

Let’s read that again, for the sake of emphasis: ‘That would probably be the first time an indigenous population has voluntarily become a minority in its historic homeland.’ Perhaps the thesis of this entire article is summarized best by that quote excerpt alone. It summarizes the point I am trying to get across.

Native Europeans need to rally a sense of pride, and take action in the face of this threat, and there is nothing wrong with that. Do not ever let yourself be fooled into believing that there is something wrong with wanting to preserve ones own culture and ethnicity. While the popular views of mainstream media would have you believe that multiculturalism leads to a wonderland of diversity, it in fact is precipitating the end of ethnic diversity to the detriment of the European people. When you are involved in a global paradigm as a smaller population group, with lower birthrates, but higher rates of immigration, the effects on your culture and ethnicity are catastrophic. These factors combined directly act as catalyst for societal erosion, giving way to higher crime rates, communication barriers, culture clash, and many other problems.

The building of Mosques, and establishment of entire Islamic districts within ancestral European homelands, where the locals are harassed and antagonized for not adhering to the policies of foreigners. The rape of native European women on their own land, by foreigners. Murders, and racist hate crimes on native Europeans, within their own homeland by foreigners. This is not racist xenophobia – this is reality, this is happening right now. Do your research, and educate yourself on it.

As the saying goes, sometimes great fences make great neighbors. Indigenous Europeans owe the rest of the world nothing. Europe has no obligations to receive hordes of foreigners fleeing from their inhospitable lands of origin. Europe does not need them – they need us, very much in the same way that the countries they flee from need them. It is their responsibility to improve their living conditions. Europe and its ancestral people have every right to protect their ancestral homeland, and the foundations of their identity.

The globalist agenda, coordinated by a worldwide network of corrupt bankers, politicians, and corporations with shared interests, profit off of multiculturalism and political correctness, which both feeds and maintains their machine. They can’t afford to not sell out to multiculturalism, because it would mean slimmer profit margins due to a smaller customer base. Multiculturalism and political correctness have essentially become weaponized against the western world. Europe and its indigenous people are extremely vulnerable to this, because in order for them to move forward into and as part of a globalist future, they are expected to relinquish everything that makes them European for the sake of political correctness. This includes their land, culture, traditions, and even ethnic integrity over time. All for fear of being wrongfully labelled a racist. This is how political correctness has been weaponized.

Actually take a moment to think about this. When you look at a busy street intersection in successful and rapidly developing countries like China or Japan, you see that 99% or more of the people are native to that population. They don’t need immigration to be successful, they are culturally and ethnically homogeneous, and doing just fine. China is a quickly rising world super-power. So, tell me, how can anyone justify that Europe should be any different?

It is a coward or a fool, of his or her own people, that would allow their own race and culture to be destroyed through naivety, apathy, and misguided ideals. The fact of the matter is that too much diversity eventually leads to lack of diversity. You can’t have a clear cut picture without defined borders. You lose focus of the unique and distinctive details when you blend everything together as one. This applies equally to all people on planet earth.


JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA - JUNE 14: Dutch fans enjoy the atmosphere ahead of the 2010 FIFA World Cup Group E match between Netherlands and Denmark at Soccer City Stadium on June 14, 2010 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo by Christof Koepsel/Getty Images)

European 4


Wake up!
Stand up!

If you think this is a joke, in 100 years your children’s children will not be laughing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s